Bob Abraham IOA, Cambridge Physical Morphology at High Redshifts In this talk I will show how morphological ideas shape our understanding of galaxy evolution, and present an overview of the remarkable progress made in recent years in understanding how the local morphological composition has transformed into that seen the distant Universe. I will highlight work from the LDSS+CFRS HST imaging survey and the Hubble Deep Field (HDF), which shows show quite clearly that the early-late axis Hubble system does not provide a useful framework for describing the appearance of galaxies at redshifts z > 1. I will then describe how recent data from the Southern HDF shows that the "orthogonal" axis of Hubble's tuning fork, namely the bifurcation into barred and regular systems, breaks down at even lower redshifts. Barred spirals are essentially absent in the distant Universe at z > 0.5. I argue that as a result of this work the Hubble system needs to be replaced by a system that is more objective, more physically meaningful, and which is applicable across a wider range of redshifts. In view of this observational evidence for changing morphology (and corresponding theoretical predictions from hierarchical clustering models), I will argue that we need a better tool for probing morphological evolution at high redshifts. The observational focus of morphological work should be explicitly linked to star-formation history, and assume that morphology itself is a transient property. I will present a new technique that attempts to achieve this, based on matching *spatially resolved* four-band HST colour data to the predictions of evolutionary synthesis models. Given some simplifying assumptions I demonstrate how our technique is capable of probing the evolutionary history of galaxy morphology. I will quantify the relative age, dispersion in age, ongoing star-formation rate, and star-formation history of distinct galaxy components, and explicitly test for the presence of dust and quantify its effect on our conclusions. I will then address the following questions: (1) Are ellipticals in the field old at high redshifts? (2) What came first, bulges or disks? (3) Does the Hubble Sequence contain its own ground state, ie. are there classes of galaxies at high redshifts with no local counterparts? (4) Does the starlight inventory obtained by resolved colour fitting add up in a consistent way in order to account for the star-formation history of the Universe measured by other techniques?