Title: WHY WE MIGHT BE ALONE: The Case Against Earth-Like Planets Jeffrey F. Bell Hawaii Institute of Geophysics & Planetology Abstract: Since 1960 the idea that our Galaxy is filled with life-bearing planets has grown from an idle speculation by a few astronomers into a major official justification for the US space exploration program (and many basic science projects as well). However, over the last 40 years numerous discoveries have called this doctrine into question: -- The "Drake equation" was predicated on an ageless steady-state universe, whereas the appearance of free oxygen and animal life on Earth took at least 1/3 the now-accepted age of the universe. -- The accumulation of adequate amounts of heavy elements in the interstellar medium to form Earth-mass planets probably did not occur until shortly before the Earth actually formed; this implies that most such planets are too young to have free oxygen or ozone. -- Rising luminosity of H-burning stars implies that the habitable zone around a solar-type star moves significantly outward over geologic time, so that rare combinations of geological and biological evolution are necessary to avoid Venus-like desertification or Europa-like global freezing. -- Global extinctions caused by impacts or astrophysical catastrophes may be much more common in other system and/or other regions of the Galaxy. -- Earth's large moon was created by a low-probability event; if the Moon played a key role in evolution of Earth's climate and biosphere the histories of typical Earth-sized planets may be very different. -- The so-called Jovian planets detected to date around other stars are very different from Jupiter; many are in highly elliptical "Earth-Killer" orbits which suggest that they are are actually small brown-dwarf stars which are not useful flags for "normal" planetary systems. The current practice of calling any object smaller than 15 Jupiter masses a "planet" (even if not orbiting a star!) is With a few notable exceptions, the astronomy community ignores these issues and continues to promote the Old-Time Religion that the discovery of abundant Earth-like planets is inevitable. We should also prepare ourselves and the public for the possible alternate result that both exo-Jupiters and exo-Earths will be very rare. (Projects already underway could prove this definitively within the next 5-7 years.) Given the current inflated expectations of the general public, such a result could have a catastrophic effect on the credibility of space scientists. A similar backlash after the negative results from the Viking soil microbe experiments of 1976 destroyed the Mars program for 20 years.