Ancient history: N-body experiments tested crucial aspects of merger hypothesis:
Halos which interpenetrate to half-mass radius merge on next passage (White 1978, 1979).
Merging largely preserves relative binding energy and radial gradients (White 1978, 1979).
|
The radial profile at large r is a genuine
signature of merging (violent relaxation & phase mixing)
and tends to
since f (E) is continuous at E = 0 (Jaffee 1987, White 1987). |
Barnes (1988) |
In projection, merger remnants have r1/4-law profiles, but these are dominated by pre-existing bulges at small r.
Conservation of phase-space density precludes an r1/4-law profile in mergers of pure disks (Carlberg 1986); the profile flattens out as r -> 0.
Barnes (1992) |
Barnes (1992) |
Newly-merged galaxies (left) have lumpy and irregular structure, including `shells', `ripples', `loops', and 'plumes' commonly noted in peculiar systems (Schweizer 1982). Within a few crossing times (right), these features fade and a smooth triaxial object emerges.
|
Barnes (1992) |
Barnes (1992) |
Newly-merged galaxies (left) have lumpy and irregular structure, including `shells', `ripples', `loops', and 'plumes' commonly noted in peculiar systems (Schweizer 1982). Within a few crossing times (right), these features fade and a smooth triaxial object emerges.
Barnes (1992) |
Barnes (1992) |
Newly-merged galaxies (left) have lumpy and irregular structure, including `shells', `ripples', `loops', and 'plumes' commonly noted in peculiar systems (Schweizer 1982). Within a few crossing times (right), these features fade and a smooth triaxial object emerges.
Bendo & Barnes (2000) Pure N-body remnants have velocity profiles with shallow
leading edges and steep trailing edges -- but in ellipticals
it's the other way around! |
Bendo & Barnes (2000) |
|
The line profiles observed in ellipticals can be interpreted
as signatures of embedded stellar disks -- a disk naturally
yields a profile with the correct asymmetry
(anti-correlation of h3 with v).
These observed profiles reinforce other (eg, photometric) evidence for disks in E galaxies. |
|
|
The line profiles observed in ellipticals can be interpreted
as signatures of embedded stellar disks -- a disk naturally
yields a profile with the correct asymmetry
(anti-correlation of h3 with v).
These observed profiles reinforce other (eg, photometric) evidence for disks in E galaxies. |
|
| Mergers of gas-rich galaxies can form disks. |
|
The line profiles observed in ellipticals can be interpreted
as signatures of embedded stellar disks -- a disk naturally
yields a profile with the correct asymmetry
(anti-correlation of h3 with v).
These observed profiles reinforce other (eg, photometric) evidence for disks in E galaxies. |
|
|
Mergers of gas-rich galaxies can form disks.
Moreover, these disks often have interesting
kinematics, including counter-rotation! |
But these disks are gas, not stars!
| We need to find the right star-formation prescription to actually make this work. |
A challenge for N-body simulators: exhibit a merger of two gas-rich disk galaxies producing a remnant with an embedded stellar disk (formed from the gas) and with velocity profiles similar to those seen in real ellipticals.
In groups and clusters, merger remnants are likely to be invloved in further mergers. What do we know about such mergers?
| One recent study finds that E+E mergers (contours) produce remnants with less rotation and more anisotropy than D+D mergers (shaded); most appear consistent with massive, boxy, slowly-rotating elliptical galaxies (filled squares). |
Naab, Khochfar, & Burkert (2006) |
|
Massive black holes (MBH) appear to be universal in
early-type galaxies. Models of E+E mergers must
confront the dynamics of binary black holes.
Hypothesis: binary black holes are necessary to transform the steep cusps of small ellipticals into the shallow `cores' of bright ellipticals (Ebisuzaki, Makino, & Okumura 1991; Milosavljevic & Merritt 2001). |
Milosavljevic & Merritt (2001) |
Worth doing... but validity of results remains uncertain.
Do E+E merger simulations produce remnants with the right structure? Are line profiles consistent with observations?
Can decoupled cores and other kinematic features survive hierarchical mergers? If not (and it seems unlikely that they can) do detections of decoupled cores in cluster galaxies constrain hierarchical merging?
Can binary MBHs coalesce fast enough to avoid the formation of triple MBH systems and the inevitable slingshot ejections which would spoil the relationship between MBH and galaxy mass/velocity dispersion?
| Modeling the behavior of the ISM is hard even for in-active galaxies! A promising two-phase model leads to a simple effective equation of state; below some threshold density star formation is inoperative and the gas is isothermal, while at higher densities energy from supernovae boosts the pressure (Springel & Hernquist 2003). |
Springel, DiMatteo, & Hernquist (2005a) |
Di Matteo, Springel, & Hernquist [source: chandra.harvard.edu] |
|
Di Matteo, Springel, & Hernquist [source: chandra.harvard.edu] |
| One possible consequence of feedback is to produce `red and dead' ellipticals. Without AGN feedback, too much gas is left to fuel star formation and remnants remain relatively blue. By terminating star formation, AGN feedback allows mergers to quickly transition to the red population (Springel, Di Matteo, & Hernquist 2005b). |
Springel, Di Matteo, & Hernquist (2005b) |
AGN feedback is most effective in massive galaxies (where MBH growth is most pronounced). Thus, this mechanism helps account for massive red galaxies at high redshift.
Are galactic-scale outflows driven by energy input to the ISM alone, or are momemtum inputs (SN ejecta, AGN jets) significant?
In ultra-luminous IR galaxies, the energy reprocessed by the ISM from UV to IR is sufficient to unbind the baryons in a few Myr. Can models of this reprocessing justify the 5% coupling of AGN luminosity to gas used by Springel et al.?
In the Springel et al. simulations, feedback can stabilize pure gas disks. Can real galaxies do the same trick? Is there any evidence for such high gas fractions at early times?
Fitting a simulation to a real pair of interacting disk galaxies involves exploring a large parameter space.
| Orbit | p , e , μ | 3 |
| Orientations | i 1 , ω1 , i 2 , ω2 | 4 |
| Time | t P | 1 |
| View | θX , θY , θZ | 3 |
| Scale | S L , S V | 2 |
| Center | α , δ , cz | 3 |
| Total | 16 |
| The parameter space may be abstracted using cylindrical coordinates. The vertical coordinate represents parameters which can be chosen after a simulation has been run. The azimuthal coordinate represents disk orientations. The radial coordinate represents orbit parameters. |
|
| The parameter space may be abstracted using
cylindrical coordinates. The vertical coordinate represents
parameters which can be chosen after a simulation has been run.
The azimuthal coordinate represents disk orientations. The
radial coordinate represents orbit parameters.
Simulating a real system involves guessing some set of initial conditions and integrating forward to see if they match the data. Trial and error may eventually yield a satisfactory match. |
|
Finding a good match to both morphology and kinematics can
require many experiments. Here is a subset of the runs John
Hibbard and I did to match the Mice (NGC 4676).
|
Modeling trade study [John Hibbard] |
Earlier stages of tidal interactions can be
modeled with test-particle disks in massive spheroids. A
spherical cloud of particles on circular orbits represents
all possible disk orientations. The disk particles to
display are selected interactively after simulation is run.
|
|
| Earlier stages of tidal interactions can be
modeled with test-particle disks in massive spheroids. A
spherical cloud of particles on circular orbits represents
all possible disk orientations. The disk particles to
display are selected interactively after simulation is run.
|
|
|
Joshua E. Barnes
(barnes@ifa.hawaii.edu)
Last modified: October 3, 2006 http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/~barnes/talks/stsci/talk.html |
|